out of time
-
Sunspot 0.8 is out
On Friday, I released the next milestone in Sunspot, version 0.8. This version doesn’t add to or change any of the basic functionality, but does add some advanced features which the app I work on for my day job happens to demand. Here’s a rundown:
Direct access to the Query API
Users of Sunspot will doubless be familiar with Sunspot’s search DSL, which gives an English-like interface for constructing search parameters. In some cases, however, such a DSL is actually counterproductive, particularly when searches are being built by an intermediate object, and thus not necessarily all in one place. So, the new methods
Sunspot.new_search()andSearch#query()are exposed, and theSunspot::Queryclass itself is now part of the public API. What I have in mind in particular here is an application of the Go4 Builder pattern, along with ActiveRecord’s hash-initializer pattern, to elegantly translate web query parameters into a Sunspot search. Here’s a stripped-down example of what I think the code will look like to do that:class EventSearchBuilder attr_reader :search def initialize(options = {}) @search = Sunspot.new_search(Event) options.each_pair do |attr, value| if respond_to?("#{attr}=") send("#{attr}=", value) end end end def when=(day_string) case day_string when 'future' @search.query.add_restriction(:start_time, :greater_than, Time.now) when 'past' @search.query.add_restriction(:start_time, :less_than, Time.now) else date_time = Date.parse(day_string).to_time @search.query.add_restriction(:start_time, :between, date_time..(date_time + 1.day)) end end def page=(page) @search.query.paginate(page) end def sort=(field) @search.query.order_by(field) end endThen in controller code, it’s as simple as:
def search @search = EventSearchBuilder.new(params).search @search.execute! endDynamic Fields
I wouldn’t be surprised if I’m the only person who ever uses this feature of Sunspot, but just in case, let’s look at a real-world example. Let’s say part of my data model uses free-form key-value pairs, which use a constrained (but user-definable) set of keys and free-form values. I’ll call my model
KeyValuePairs.The trick I would like to pull here is that I would like to treat each key as a separate field in search, so that I can constrain, order, facet, etc. on the values for one key without them being affected by other keys. Since the keys are user-defined, I can’t just set up normal fields at build time; they need to be defined at index time. Enter Sunspot’s dynamic fields (we’ll use Sunspot::Rails’s wrapper API here):
class Business < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :key_value_pairs searchable do dynamic_string :key_value_pairs do key_value_pairs.inject({}) do |hash, pair| hash.merge(pair.key.to_sym => pair.value) end end end endThis sets up a dynamic field which is populated using the given block. What’s important there is that the field is populated using a hash - the keys of the hash become individual dynamic fields, and the values populate those fields in the index. The “base name” of the field is
key_value_pairs, which is used to namespace the dynamic names that come out of the hash.Working with dynamic fields is a lot like working with regular ones, except in the query, calls are wrapped in a
dynamicblock:Business.search do dynamic :key_value_pairs do with(:cuisine, 'Sushi') facet(:atmosphere) end endNaturally, those field names (
:cuisine,:atmosphere) wouldn’t be hard-coded in a real application, since they would not be known at build time.Dirty Sessions
Sessions now track whether any operations have been performed since the last time a
commitwas issued. TheSession#dirty?method answers that question, and theSession#commit_if_dirtydoes exactly what it sounds like. Useful methods if you want to keep your commits to a minimum (you do) but you may have various parts of the code issuing Sunspot operations without any central knowledge on the part of your application.That’s all for now
Sunspot 0.9 is up next; the main goal for that version is to replace solr-ruby with RSolr as the low-level Solr interface, which will open the door to more features in future versions (query-based faceting, LocalSolr support, etc.), but probably won’t have much effect on the API for that version (other than supporting use of the faster Curb library for the HTTP communication with Solr).